Essays / 2026-11-10

Ending Silent Zero-Coercion: The Five-State Epistemic Data Standard

Defaulting a rain-skipped Varroa wash to '0' fabricates a clean health record out of an unmeasured check. Praksis schemas separate five explicit states of knowledge.

Five-state epistemic data standard diagram distinguishing NULL, N/A, UNKNOWN, SUSPECT, and VERIFIED
SPEC-04 · Technical record

PRAKSİS / PUBLICATIONS

Ending Silent Zero-Coercion: The Five-State Epistemic Data Standard

One of the quietest failure modes in operational software is silent zero-coercion: turning an uninspected numeric input into `0` by default. When rain shortens an apiary visit and an unperformed Varroa mite wash is stored as `0.00`, subsequent inspections misread absence of measurement as verified absence of infestation.

Under SPEC-04 (Epistemic Data Standard v1.0), every observation field across Praksis relational tables and JSON contracts carries an explicit five-state provenance envelope: unmeasured in that window (`NULL`), structurally inapplicable to the current stage or category (`N/A`), unverifiable historical origin (`UNKNOWN`), noisy or anomalous reading held in quarantine (`SUSPECT`), and schema-validated observation with stated margin (`VERIFIED`).

This single invariant governs F01–F10 hive cross-sections in Artvin, the 28-case Clinical Apidology Atlas, and high-altitude GPX telemetry on Mount Sandras. Whenever required inputs are `NULL` or `SUSPECT`, decision calculators refuse synthetic averages and surface the exact epistemic gap to the operator.